The Public
Platform
"THE War
of Lethal Weapons"
By:-Misbaah Hashmi
Email: - misbahaalia2@gmail.com
The horrible reality of
terrorism had become an almost unbeatable challenge for the global world,
particularly to South Asians nations. The shapes of terrorism have changed but
essence is the same. Bloodshed, uncertainty, to weak the will of state by
victimizing the innocent citizens. Terrorist organizations had been affecting
local, regional and international peace from their inception. On, one hand
acting as silent killer either in Islamic countries or western countries
turning to devastation of human capital as well as material capital. The lethal
impacts of terrorism evident are in the whole world.
Though, terrorism posses
great security challenge to the modern state system. As non-state actors has
been racking havoc of terrorism at the state actors. This modern war fare has
been labeled as the 4th generation of wars. This is the war of
winning mind and souls of the citizens. During this war false dreams are used
as psychological tool to spiritually and socially pollute the mindset of the modern
citizens.
So, can this war be won by
applying traditional tools of warfare against an invisible enemy? Is the piling
of heaps of lethal weapons and directing against the state actors mitigate the
threat posed by the monster of terrorism.
The long journey of organized
terrorism unleashed ethnic, lingual, regional and political or religious
confrontation. The concept of "Maxilien Robespierre" usher the terrorism
and can we deny the "Sicarri", (Jewish Group) "Hashhashin" assassination
of Abbasid, Seljuk. "Subdue by terror the enemies of Liberty and you will
be right as founder of the Republic". So, the foundation of modern
terrorism which believes the violence will build a better system.
The main motive was to affect
the politics but opened a new world of violence. The six phases of French
revolution 1789 to 1799 and "Russian Revolution" 1917 to 9/11
incident engulfed the South Asian's countries peace and changed the world
scenario. Now we are countering Bioterrorism, Nuclear, terrorism, cyber
terrorism, eco-terrorism, Norco-terrorism and state terrorism at local, national
and international level. As far as Pakistan is concerned, it had to join US-LED
war against terrorism under the doctrine of necessity in the era of President
Musharraf to counter terrorism. Pakistan had waged war against terrorism and
paid heavy price at the cost of human capital as well as material capital: 70
thousand civilians and military persons were martyred and suffered loss to the
tune of 40 billion US dollars, argue the competent analyst.
The question pinch our
memories is that why world had spent or lost the two trillion dollars in war
against terrorism and reshaped the Iraq, Afghanistan, Sudan, Libya, Syria and targeting
terrorist groups at any cost. The answer is simple. The desperate attacks and
evil attempts by terrorist groups had invoked. Security threats for western
countries as well as South Asian countries it is a bitter reality that a defense
policy of one country proved offensive policy for another country. To promote
the national interests of one's own country has to adopt inflexible behaviors.
As for as the South Asian region is concerned, it has two main players and game
changers: Pakistan and India. Both countries are Nuclear powers and have long
history of cultural, religious, lingual, regional differences. Pakistan has
bitter experiences of 1965, 1971, 1998 from the very first day. Pakistan has
been at the target of Indian state aggression. So, both countries adopted
aggressive defense and foreign policies. Pakistan has disparity of 1 into 5 in
the conventional warfare terms. The war of 1971 compelled Pakistan to go for
nuclear warfare project. It was primarily policy to thwart the evil designs of
aggression of Indian state policy. The launching of Ballistic Missile Naseir is
infect a defensive response to mitigate the threat posed by Indian policy
postures to disturb the balance of power in the south Asian region. That was inevitable
to maintain the nuclear power in the south region. After a long struggle Nasir Missile
experiment became a constructive foreign policy of Pakistan. On this occasion
the appraisal remarks of General Qamar javed Bajwa enhance the model of
Pakistani team concerning the Nasir Missile. It is a good step to counter the heinous
designs of Indian State. But it is a painful strategic development. It would
certainly leads to acceleration of threat perception on either side of the Indo
Pak border.
Can this defuse the prevailing
tension between the two countries? Can this policy paradigm of both states
serve as a tool of salvation by piling of lethal weapons? The present scenario
deserves to be change. The wise step would be to reduce the race of piling up
weapons. The hovering threats always erupt from socio economic backwardness
instead of possessive files of weapons. So being a nation and a state our salvation
lie in humanism, progressivism and enlightenment instead of free production of
lethal weapon. The major cause of concern South Asian's people lies in
sustainable regional cooperation's and democratic countries promotes
fundamental rights at all level and both countries should be urgent advocator
of humanism and take urgent steps for collective of the region by promoting peace
and tranquility.
Though, weapons are essential
to thwart the threat of war against state actors. Yet it must not be forgotten
that terrorism is largely designed and executed by the non-state actors. So,
the new policy tool must be collective and sustainable war against the heinous,
lethal philosophies and ideologies. This would also ultimately lead to the end
of the war of lethal weapons.
0 comments:
Speak up your mind
Tell us what you're thinking... !